2008 Gateway to Graduation Toolkit
Technology & Teachers Role in Increased Student EngagementCrossing the Critical Chasms: 8th Grade algebra & 3rd Grade ReadingIndividualized Instruction: Student centered approach to learning including formative assessment and personalized curriculum

Student Engagement Home

 Search Toolkit 2008

SETDA - State Educational Technology Directors Association

Toolkit Partners

Be Cybersmart

School Improvement Netwrok

smart Technologies

 

 
Student Engagement: Resources

Alliance for Excellent Education (2007). High school dropouts in America

Arts Education Partnership • Perpich Center for Arts Education •

Assessing Student Engagement Rates -
Alternative reality: UW prof touts computer game learning

Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (2006). The Silent Epidemic, Perspectives of High School Dropouts. A report by Civic Enterprises in association with Peter D. Hart Research Associates for the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Bowen, E. (2002). Student Engagement and Its Relation to Quality Work Design: A Review of the Literature.

Building the Field of Digital Media and Learning

Business Roundtable (2005). Tapping America’s Potential: The Education for Innovation Initiative.

California's CyberSafety website

CoSN to school leaders: 'Think before you ban'  When it comes to Web 2.0 technologies, educators should find a balance that allows for creativity, collaboration, and safety. 

CyberSmart! Education Company (2008). Research Basis for CyberSmart! Online Professional Development.

Department of Commerce (2003). Digital Economy

Dowson, M., & McInerney, D.M. (2001). Psychological parameters of students’ social and work avoidance goals: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93,35-42.

Ed Week (2006). Tracking U.S. Trends, Ed Week Technology Counts.

ENA (2007). Web 2.0: Blogs and Podcasts in Education, Posted by Kylie Watkins

Fairfax County Case Study (2006), Smart Technologies

Federal Trade Commission’s Kidz Privacy Project

Foehr, U., Rideout, V. & Roberts, D. (2005). Generation M: Media in the lives of 8-18 year-olds. Kaiser Family Foundation.

GetNetWise

Gloucester City Public Schools Case Study (2005), Smart Technologies

Hall Memorial School Case Study (2005), Smart Technologies

Hancock, V., & Betts, F. (2002, April 1). Back to the future: Preparing learners for academic success in 2004. Learning and Leading with Technology, 29(7), 10-14.

Hu, W. (2008). New York Times. Students click, and a quiz becomes a game.

Interactive Whiteboards and Learning Whitepaper (2006), Smart Technologies

iSafe.org

Jennings School District Case Study (2005), Smart Technologies

Lamesa ISD Case Study (2008), School Improvement Network

Learning Languages in Context - A startup called Live Mocha, based in Bellevue, WA, aims to harness the power of online social networking to help students learn language and stay motivated.

Lenhart, A. & Madden, M. (2007). Social networking websites and teens: an overview. Pew Internet Project Data Memo.

Levin, D. & Arafeh, S. (2002). The digital disconnect: The widening gap between internet-savvy students and their schools. American Institutes for Research

Local Schools Battling High-Tech Distractions

Lumsden, L. S. (1994). Student motivation to learn. ERIC Digest, Number 92. Eugene, OR: ERIC Clearinghouse on Educational Management. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service Number ED370200)

Mann, D., & Shafer, E. A. (1997, July). An investment in technology pays off in student performance, these researchers say. The American School Board Journal.

McHugh, J. (2008).  Edutopia. Synching Up with the iKid: Connecting to the Twenty-First-Century Student  

Medina, J. (2007). New York Times. Reaching out to students when they talk and text. 

Milken Exchange on Education Technology. (1999). The impact of education technology on student achievement: What the most current research has to say. Santa Monica, CA:

Milken Family Foundation.

National Center for Missing and Exploited Children

NetSmartz Program

National Cyber Security Alliance

National School Boards Association (NSBA) (2007). Creating and Connecting. Research and Guidelines on Online Social and Educational Networking.

National School Boards Association (NSBA) (2007). Research and Guidelines for Children’s Use of the Internet.

Navigation 101 is a life skills and planning curriculum for students in grades 6 through 12. It aims to help students make clear, careful, and creative plans for life beyond high school.

NCREL (2005). Using Student Engagement to Improve Adolescent Literacy.

Net Family News Newsletter 

North Carolina’s Wise Owl Website

Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2007). Education Forum: What it Takes to Compete, Seeing US education through the prism of international comparisons.

Osberg, K. M. (1997). Constructivism in practice: the case for meaning-making in the virtual world. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington.

PD 360 : Professional Development 360

Project Safety Net

Research and Guidelines on Online Social - and Educational - Networking (NSBA)

Rumberger, R. (2004). Why students drop out of school. Dropouts In America: Confronting The Graduation Rate Crisis ed. Gary Orfield, 131-155. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.

Schlechty Center for Leadership in School Reform

Schlechty, P. C. (2001). Shaking up the schoolhouse. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

School Improvement Network (2008) Case Study: Scotland County. Scotland County, North Carolina.

Speak Up 2006.

Speak Up 2007.

Students Click, and a Quiz Becomes a Game

University of Virginia Factsheet (2007), Smart Technologies

Voice of Students on Engagement: A Report on the 2006 High School Survey of Student Engagement -

Voke, H. (2002, February). Motivating students to learn. ASCD Infobrief, 2(28).

Yazzie-Mintz, E. (2007). Voices of Students on Engagement: A Report on the 2006 High School Survey of Student Engagement.

Zorfass, J., & Copel, H. (1995, September). The I-search: Guiding students toward relevant research. Educational Leadership, 53(1), 48-51