Ascher, C. (1998). Improving the School-Home Connection for Poor and Minority Students. The Urban Review 20: 109-123.
Attewell, P. (2003). Beyond the Digital Divide. In Disadvantaged Teens and Computer Technologies, ed. P. Attewell and N. See, 15-35. New York: Waxmann Publishers.
Attewell, P., and Battle, J. (1999). Home Computers and School Performance. The Information Society 15: 1-10.
Attewell, P., Suazo-Garcia, B., and Battle, J. (2003). Computers and Young Children: Social Benefit or Social Problem? Social Forces 1: 277-296.
Attewell, P., and Winston, H. (2003). Children of the Digital Divide. In Disadvantaged Teens and Computer Technologies, ed. P. Attewell and N. See, 117-135. New York: Waxmann Publishers.
Ba, H., Talley, W., and Tsikalas, K. (2002). Investigating Children’s Emerging Digital Literacies. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment, 1(4). http://www.jtla.org (accessed Oct. 26, 2004).
Bartfai, N., Frechtling, J., Silverstein, G., Snow, K., and Somers, L. (1999). Telecommunications and Information Infrastructure Assistance Program: Collected Case Study Evaluations. Report prepared for the U.S. Department of Commerce. Rockville, MD: Westat.
Becker, H.J. (2000a). Findings from the Teaching, Learning and Computing Survey: Is Larry Cuban Right? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(51). http://eppa.asu.edu/epaa/v8n51 (accessed March 2, 2004).
Becker, H.J. (2000b). Pedagogical Motivations for Student Computer Use That Lead to Student Engagement. Educational Technology (Sept.-Oct.): 2-16.
Becker, H.J. (2001). How Are Teachers Using Computers in Instruction? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, April 10-15.
Becker, H.J. (2002). Technical Expertise Is Not Enough. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, April 1-5.
Becker, H.J., and Lovitts, B.E. (2003). A Project-Based Approach to Assessing Technology. Evaluating Educational Technology: Effective Research Designs for Improving Learning, ed. G.D. Haertel and B. Means, 129-148. New York: Teachers College Press.
Bernt, P.W., Bernt, J.P., and Turner, S.V. (2003). Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. Chicago, April 21-25. http://oak.cats.ohiou.edu/~turners/research/gender.pdf (accessed Jan. 25 2007).
Blanton, W.E., Greene, M.E., and Cole, M. (1999). Computer Mediation for Learning and Play. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy 43(3): 272-278.
Canada, K., and Brusca, F. (1992). The Technological Gender Gap: Evidence and Recommendations for Educators and Computer-Based Instruction Designers. Educational Technology Research and Development 39(2). http://www.arielpcs.com/resources/articles/etrd.shtml (accessed Sept. 3, 2001).
Caplan, J., Hall, G., et al. (1997). Literature Review of School-Family Partnerships. In Pathways to School Improvement. Naperville, IL: North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
Caron, A.H., Giroux, L., and Douzou, S. (1989). Uses and Impacts of Home Computers in Canada: A Process of Reappropriation. Media Use in the Information Age, ed. J. Salvaggio, J. Bryant, et al., 147-162. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Catsambis, S. (1998). Expanding Knowledge of Parental Involvement in Education—Effects on High School Academic Success. CRESPAR Tech. Rep. No. 27. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University, Center for the Education of Students Placed at Risk. www.csos.jhu.edu/crespar/techReports/Report27.pdf (accessed June 5, 2003).
CDW Government, Inc. (2005). CDW-G Teachers Talk Technology 2005. Teachers Talk Tech White Paper. http://newsroom.cdwg.com/features/TTTCompleteResults.pdf (accessed Jan. 11 2007).
Christenson, S., and Sheridan, S.M. (2001). Schools and Families: Creating Essential Connections for Learning. New York: Guildford Press.
Cohen, J. (1988). Set Correlation and Contingency Tables. Applied Psychological Measurement. 12(4):425-434.
Coley, R. (1997). Technology’s Impact: A New Study Shows the Effectiveness--and the Limitations--of School Technology. Electronic School. http://www.electronicschool.com/0997f3.html (accessed June 30, 2005).
Collins, A., Harte, A., and Cooper, J.L. Enhancing Local Involvement in Education through Quality Leadership. St. Johns, Newfoundland: Memorial University of Newfoundland.
Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and Underused: Computers in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Day, J.C., Janus, A., and Davis, J. (2005). Computer and Internet Use in the United States. Current Population Reports. http://www.census.gov/prod/2005pubs/p23-208.pdf (accessed Jan. 10, 2007 ).
Duffy, T.R., and McMahon, T.A. (1999). Linking Homes and Elementary Schools with Computers: The Impact on Pedagogy. CRLT Technical Report No. 9-99. Ann Arbor: Center for Research and Teaching.
http://www.crlt.indiana.edu/publications/workpapers/crlt99-9.pdf (accessed Jan. 25, 2007).
Dutton, W.H., Rogers, E.M., and Jun, S-H. (1987). The Diffusion and Impacts of Information Technology in Households. Oxford Surveys in Information Technology, ed. P.I. Zorkoczy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dynarsky, M., Agodina, R., Heaviside, S., Novak, T., Carey, N., Campuzano, L., Means, B., Murphy, R., Penuel, W., Javitz, H., Emery, D., and Sussex, W. (2007). Effectiveness of Reading and Mathematics Software Products: Findings from the First Student Cohort, Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
Eisenberg, M.B., and Johnson, D. (2005). Learning and Teaching Information Technology Computer Skills in Context. Chicago, IL: American Association of School Librarians. http://www.libraryinstruction.com/info-tech.html (accessed Jan. 25, 2007).
Epstein, J.L., and Connors, L.L. (1992). School and Family Partnerships. Practitioner 18(4).
Fadel, C., and Lemke, C. (2006). Technology in Schools: What the Research Says. Culver City, CA: The Metiri Group. http://www.metiri.com/TechnologyinSchoolsReport.pdf (accessed Jan. 12, 2007).
Fairlie, R.W. (2003). The Effects of Home Computers on School Enrollment. New York: National Center for the Study of Privatization in Education, Teachers College. http://www.ncspe.org/publications_files/fairlir.pdf (accessed Jan. 10, 2007).
Fredricks, J.A., Blumenfeld, P.C., and Paris, A.H. (2004). School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence. Review of Educational Research 74(1): 59-92.
Frohlich, D., and Kraut, R. (2003). The Social Context of Home Computing. HP Labs Technical Reports, (HPL-2003-70). http://www.hpl.hp.com/techreports/2003/HPL-2003-70.pdf (accessed Jan. 11, 2007).
Fuchs, T., and Woessmann, L. (2004). Computers and Student Learning: Bivariate and Multivariate Evidence on the Availability and Use of Computers at Home and at School. Ifo Institute for Economic Research, CESifo Working Paper Series No. 1321. http://www.res.org.uk/econometrics/504.pdf (accessed Jan. 10, 2007).
Gardner, J. (1994). Personal Portable Computers and the Curriculum. Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research.
Giaquinta, J.B., Bauer, J., and Levin, J.E. (1993). Beyond Technology’s Promise: An Examination of Children’s Educational Computing at Home. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Grunwald Associates. (2005). Connected to the Future: A Report on Children’s Internet Use from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. http://www.cpb.org/stations/reports/connected/connected_report.pdf (accessed Jan. 25, 2007).
Haertel, G., and Means, B. (2000). Stronger Designs for Research on Educational Uses of Technology: Conclusion and Implications. Menlo, CA: SRI International. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&lr=&q=cache:LXOMG0nOtgoJ:www.sri.com/policy/designkt/synthe1b.pdf+haertel+and+means (accessed Jan. 11, 2007).
Hale, K.V. (2002). Gender Differences in Computer Technology Achievement. Meridian—A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal 5(2). http://www.ncsu/meridian/sum2002/gender (accessed Jan. 31, 2007).
Hickman, C.W., Greenwood, G., and Miller, M.D. (1995). High School Parent Involvement: Relationships with Achievement, Grade Level, SES, and Gender. Journal of Research & Development in Education 28:125-134.
Horejsi, M.G., and Strickland, A. (2004). Field-Based Technology in Idaho Middle School Science Classrooms: An Evaluation of Performance and Attitude Data from Students. Electronic Journal for the Integration of Technology in Education 3(2). http://ejite.isu.edu/Volume3No2/horejsi.pdf/ (accessed Jan 11, 2007).
International Society for Technology in Education. (2002). National Educational Technology Standards: Preparing Teachers to Use Technology, ed. M.G. Kelly and A. McAnear. Washington, DC: Author.
Jackson, L.A., von Eye, A., and Biocca, F. (2003). Does Home Internet Use Influence the Academic Performance of Low-Income Children? Findings from the HomeNetToo Project. Proceedings of the First Latin American Web Congress. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society.
Johnson, K.A. (2000). Do Computers in the Classroom Boost Academic Achievement? Report No. 00-08. Washington, DC: The Heritage Foundation. http://www.heritage.org/Research/Education/CDA00-08.cfm (accessed Jan. 25, 2005).
Kafai, Y.B. (1996). Software for Kids by Kids. Communications of the ACM 39(4):38-39.
Kafai, Y.B., Fishman, B.J., Bruckman, A.S., and Rockman, S. (2002). Models of Educational Computing @ Home: New Frontiers for Research on Technology in Learning. Educational Technology Review 10(2): 52-68. http://www.aace.org/pubs/etr/issue3/Kafai.pdf (accessed Jan. 16, 2007).
Kleiner, B., Silverstein, G., Zhang, X. (2005). Characteristics of Households Participating in the eSPARC Study. Report prepared for the Pennsylvania Department of Education. Rockville, MD: Westat.
Knezek, G., and Christensen, R. (2004). Student Home Access and the Digital Divide: An Exploratory Analysis of Laptop Computer Access with Take-Home Privileges Versus Restrictions to Use Only in School. Research Brief MLLS0402. The Maine Learning with Laptop Study. Farmington, ME: Maine Center for Meaningful Engaged Learning.
Kornblum, W. (2003). The Digital Divide and the Severely At-Risk Student. Disadvantaged Teens and Computer Technologies, ed. P. Attewell and N. See, 107-116. New York: Waxmann Publishers.
Kraemer, H.C., Thiemann, S., and Denenberg, V.H. (1987). How Many Subjects? Statistical Power Analysis in Research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
Krendl, K.A., and Clark, G. (1994). The Impact of Computers on Learning: Research on In-School and Out-Of-School Settings. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 5(2).
Lemke, C., and Martin, C. (2004). One to One Computing in Indiana—A State Profile. Culver City, CA: The Metiri Group. http://www.metiri.com.NSF-Study/INProfile.pdf.
Mann, D., Shakeshaft, C., Becker, J., and Koltkamp, R. (1999). West Virginia Story: Achievement Gains from a Statewide Comprehensive Instructional Technology Program 1999. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange on Educational Technology.
Maynard, S., and Howley, A. (1997). Parent and Community Involvement in Rural Schools (EDO-RC-97-3). Eric Clearinghouse on Rural Education and Small Schools. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2/content_storage_01/0000000b/80/2a/28/a4.pdf (accessed Jan. 31, 2007).
McGarity, J., and Butts, D. (1984). The Relationship among Teacher Classroom Management Behavior, Student Engagement, and Student Achievement of Middle and High School Students of Varying Aptitude. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 21(1): 55-61.
McQuarrie, E.F. (1989). The Impact of a Discontinuous Innovation: Outcomes Experienced by Owners of Home Computers. Computers in Human Behavior 5: 227-240.
Mosteller, F., and Boruch, R. (eds.). (2002). Evidence Matters: Randomized Trials in Education Research. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Newberger, E.C. (2001). Internet Usage and Home Computers in the United States. Current Population Reports P23-207. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau. http://www.census.gov/prod/2001pubs/p23-207.pdf (accessed Jan. 31, 2007).
Noll, R.G., Older-Aguilar, D., Ross, R.R., and Rosston, G.L. (2004). Bridging the Digital Divide: Definitions, Measurement, and Policy Issues. Collected Papers from the Hitachi California Public Affairs Forum, ed. R.D.
Noll. Stanford, CA: California Council on Science and Technology. http://www.ccst.us/publications/2001/2001Digital.pdf (accessed Jan. 24, 2007).
O’Dwyer, L.M., Russell, M., Bevell, D., and Tucker-Seeley, D.R. (2005). Examining the Relationship between Home and School Computer Use and Students’ English/Language Arts Test Scores. Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment 3(3): 1-45. http://escholarship.bc.edu/jtla/vol3/3/ (accessed Jan. 17, 2007).
Open Research. (2004). Paying the Price? A Total Cost of Ownership Comparison Between New and Refurbished PCs in the Small Business, NGO and School in Africa. http://www.openresearch.co.za/TCO_Study_Open_Research.pdf (accessed Jan. 31, 2007).
Parsad B., Jones, J., and Greene, B. (2005). Internet Access in U.S. Public Schools and Classrooms: 1994–2003 (NCES 2005–015). Washington DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Penuel, W.R., et al. (2002). Using Technology to Enhance Connections Between Home and School: A Research Synthesis. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. http://ctl.sri.com/publications/downloads/Task1_FinalReport3.pdf (accessed Feb. 2, 2007).
Quellmatz, E., and Zalles, D.R. (2002). Integrative Performance Assessments of Technology. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International. http://ipat.sri.com/paper/pdf/ipat_finalreport.pdf (accessed Jan. 19, 2007).
Rathburn, A.H., and West, J. (2001). Young Children’s Access to Computers in the Home and at School in 1999 and 2000. Education Statistics Quarterly 5(1). http://nces.ed.gov/programs/quarterly/vol_5/5_1/q3_1.asp (accessed Jan. 24, 2007).
Raudenbush, S.W. (2000). Synthesizing Results from the NAEP Trial Assessment. Analytic Issues in the Assessment of Student Achievement, ed. D. Grissmer and M. Ross (NCES 2000–050). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
Raudenbush, S.W., and Liu, X. (2000). Statistical Power and Optimal Design for Multisite Randomized Trials. Psychological Methods 5(2): 199-213.
Ravitz, J., Mergendoller, J., and Rush, W. (2002). What’s School Got to Do with It?—Cautionary Tales about Correlations between Student Computer Use and Academic Achievement. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, April 1-5.
Ringstaff, C., and Kelley, L. (2002). The Learning Return on Our Educational Technology Investment: A Review of Findings from Research. San Francisco: WestEd. http://rtecexchange.edgateway.net/learningreturn.pdf (accessed Feb. 2, 2007).
Rocheleau, B. (1995). Computer Use by School-Age Children: Trends, Patterns and Predictors. Journal of Educational Computing Research 1: 1-17.
Rockman, S., et al. (1998). Powerful Tools for Schooling: Second Year Study of the Laptop Program. San Francisco: Author. http://www.microsoft.com/Education/aalresearch2.mspx (accessed Jan. 23, 2007).
Rockman, S., et al. (2003). Learning from Laptops. Threshold (Fall): 24-28.
Rossi, P.H., and Freeman, H.E. (1989). Evaluation: A Systemic Approach, 4th ed. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Rumberger, R.E. (2002). A Multi-Level, Longitudinal Approach to Evaluating the Effectiveness of Educational Technology. Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
Russell, M., Bebell, D., and Higgins, J. (2004). Laptop Learning: A Comparison of Teaching and Learning in Upper Elementary School Equipped with Shared Carts of Laptops and Permanent 1:1 Laptops. Boston: Boston College Technology and Assessment Study Collaborative.
Russell, M., O’Brien, E., Bebell, D., and O’Dwyer, L. (2003). Students’ Beliefs, Access, and Use of Computers in School and at School. Boston: Boston College Technology and Assessment Study Collaborative. http://www.bc.edu/research/intasc/studies/USEIT/pdf/USEIT_r2.pdf (accessed Jan. 23, 2006).
Samaras, A.P. and Wilson, J.C. (1999). Am I Invited? Perspectives of Family Involvement with Technology in Inner-City Schools. Urban Education 34(4): 499-531.
Sandholz, J.H, Ringstaff, C., and Dwyer, D.C. (1994). Student Engagement Revisited: Views from Technology-Rich Classrooms. ACOT Report No. 21. http://images.apple.com/education/k12/leadership/acot/pdf/rpt21.pdf (accessed Jan. 12, 2007).
Schneider, B., Carnoy, M., Kilpatrick, J., Schmidt, W., and Shavelson, R. (2007). Estimating Causal Effects Using Experimental and Observational Designs. A Think Tank White Paper. The Governing Board of the AERA Grants Program.
Stanger, J., and Gridina, N. (1999). Media in the Home: The Fourth Annual Survey Of Parents and Children. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania, Annenberg Public Policy Center. http://www.annenbergpublicpolicycenter.org/05_media_developing_child/mediasurvey/survey5.pdf (accessed Feb. 2, 2007).
Stevenson, K.R. (1998). Evaluation Report-Year 2: Middle School Laptop Program, Beaufort County School District. Beaufort, SC: Beaufort County School District.
Subrahmanyam, K., Greenfield, P., Kraut, R., and Gross, E. (2001). The Impact of Computer Use on Children’s and Adolescents’ Development. Applied Development Psychology 22: 7-30.
Tsikalas, K.E. (2004). Differential Effects of Home Computing on the Academic Engagement of Low- and High-Performing Middle School Students in Low-Income Communities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, April 12-16.
Tsikalas, K.E., and Gross, E. (2002). Home Computer Use among Low-Income, Minority Urban Adolescents: Fulfillment of Basic Needs and Impact on Personal and Academic Development. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, April 1-5.
Tsikalas, K.E., Gross, E.S., and Stock, E. (2002). Applying a Youth Psychology Lens to the Digital Divide: How Low-Income, Minority Adolescents Appropriate Home Computers to Meet their Needs for Autonomy, Belonging, and Competence, and How this Affects their Academic and Future Prospects. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, April 1-5.
Tsikalas, K.E., and Stock, E. (1999). Preliminary Study of Home Computer Use among Underserved Students Participating in CFY’s Pilot Program.New York: Computers for Youth. http://www.cfy.org/CFYPrelimReport-Jan2001.PDF (accessed Feb. 1, 2007).
Waxman, H.C., Lin, M., and Michko, G.M. (2003). A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Teaching and Learning with Technology on Student Outcomes. Naperville, IL: Learning Point Associates. http://www.ncrel.org/tech/effects2/waxman.pdf (accessed Jan. 12, 2007).
Wenglinsky, H. (1998). Does It Compute? The Relationship Between Educational Technology and Student Achievement in Mathematics. Policy Information Report No. PIC-TECHNOLOG. http://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/PICTECHNOLOG.pdf (accessed Jan. 12, 2007).
Final eSPARC Full Report
AERA State Policy Presentation 2006
Pennsylvania eSPARC (Post Intervention Parent Telephone Survey)