Next | Chapter Home | Toolkit Home Chapter Summary
Objective
To assist state and district leaders in planning, implementing, and assessing high quality models for teaching and learning using technology.
Key Questions
NLI Work Group Process
The High Quality Professional Development Work Group members began their task by sharing their views on the needs of the states with respect to the formulation and maintenance of high quality professional development. Discussions reflected personal experience, as well as a study of printed materials provided before the group began its work.
Initial discussions revolved around questions currently being asked within different states about professional development and the kinds of tools needed to begin to answer these questions. Work Group members separated these topics into four categories: essential questions that could be used to plan and evaluate programs and projects; a framework for comparing, assessing, and analyzing effective professional development models; a model with which to compare professional development programs and projects; and a statement in support of strong, sustained professional development for administrators. Each Work Group member selected one of these areas for further study and discussion. The four subgroups worked through several drafts of proposed content for the toolkit. Because the topics were so closely related, subgroups sometimes combined for short conversations, sent a member to join another group briefly, and engaged in frequent report-outs to the entire Work Group. Through this process, the group further refined the topics. Each subgroup developed a resource for the toolkit, responded to feedback from the entire group to adjust and fine-tune the resource, and made certain that all resources were aligned with one another.
SETDA Tools to Assist States
The High Quality Professional Development Work Group developed tools designed to assist state and district leaders in planning, implementing and assessing high quality models for teaching and learning using technology. A discussion of the needs of the states, the resources available to them, and the existing professional development models led to the creation of four components of the tools provided here by the High Quality Professional Development Work Group. They are:
|
|||||||