

Background, Process & Overall Outcomes
Quick Hints on Research for Busy Educators
Recommended Rubrics for Evaluating Research
Communicating Research Findings Effectively

Tool Participants


This tool is brought to you by generous support of:

|
|
Tool Participants
SETDA Members |
Field Experts |
- Mary Wegner, Alaska
- Jim Boardman, Arkansas
- Barbara Thalacker, California
- Kent Tamsen, Colorado***
- Wendy Modzelewski, Delaware
- Vicki Kajioka, Hawaii
- Dawn Wilson, Idaho
- Mike Huffman, Indiana
- Craig Gerdes, Kansas
- Mike Leadingham, Kentucky
- Jayne Moore, Maryland
- Robin Silas, Mississippi
- Monica Beglau, Missouri***
- Frank South, Nevada
- Cathy Higgins, New Hampshire***
- Teh-Yuan Wan, New York
- Frances Bradburn, North Carolina***
- Dan Pullen, North Dakota
- Carla Wade, Oregon***
- Kathleen Brautigam, Pennsylvania
- Tammy Mainwaring, South Carolina
- Gloria Steele, South Dakota***
- Nicole Cobb, Tennessee
- Cody Spendlove, Utah
- Philip Hyjek, Vermont
- Brenda Williams, West Virginia***
- Barry Golden, Wisconsin***
|
- Stephen Andrews, Intel Foundation***
- John Kalny, Institute of Compute Technology***
- Jason Osbourne, North Carolina State University***
- Jim Pollard, Intel Foundation***
|
^ Return to Top
|


Download the entire toolkit and more.


"Learning to use the tool for the purpose of reviewing research was valuable in that it called upon team members to develop a much deeper understanding about what quality research really looked liked including rigor of the evaluation, quality of reporting, and the ability to replicate the conditions of the study."
Carla Wade
Oregon Dept of Education
"State leaders across the country using collaborative, online workspace to share and analyze original research is an excellent demonstration of 21st Century learning."
Steve Andrews
US Program Manager
Intel Education Initiative
“Developing the tool served as apowerful professional development experience for state educational technology leaders. It provided a hands on, job embedded approach to increasing our ability to critically analyze studies conducted on the use oftechnology in schools.”
Gloria Steele
Technology & Innovation in Education
(TIE)
South Dakota |
|