SETDA National Leadership Institute Toolkit


References

Benton Foundation (2002). The E-Rate in America: A Tale of Four Cities.

Benton Foundation, & Educational Development Center, Inc. (2002) Great Expectations, Leveraging American's Investment in Educational Technology.

Boster, F., Meyer, G., Roberto, A., & Inge, C. (2001). A Report on the Effect of the Unitedstreaming Application on Educational Performance.

Burmaster, E. (2002). Wisconsin Oral Communication Assessment Educators' Guide. Wisconsin State Superintendent Department of Public Instruction.

Committee for Economic Development, & Research and Policy Committee (2001). The Digital Economy: Promoting Competition, Innovation, and Opportunity : A Statement on National Policy.

Committee on Scientific Principles for Education Research (2002). Scientific Research in Education. Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education, National Research Council.

Cybersmart (2001). Free Net Security Curriculm. www.cybersmart.org

Dugger, Jr., W. E., & Naik, N. (2001). Clarifying Misconceptions Between Technology Education and Educational Technology. The Technology Teacher.

Education Week (2001). The New Divides; Technology Counts.

eMints Evaluation Team (2002). Hallmarks of an Effective eMINTS Classroom.

eMints Evaluation Team Policy Brief (2002). Analysis of 2001 MAP Results for eMINTS Students.

eMints Evaluation Team School Observation Report (2002). Leadership Orientations of FY00 eMINTS Principals.

Gates Foundation. Taking a Good Look at Instructional Technology (TAGLIT). http://www.taglit.org/taglit/default.asp

Goldberg, A., Russell, M., & Cook, A. (1992-2002). Meta-Analysis: Writing with Computers. Technology and Assessment Study Collaborative, Boston College.

Governors Association (NGA) (2001). E-Learning Workforce for America's, A Vision of Report of the Commission on Technology and Adult Learning.

Heinecke, W. F., & Knestis, K. (2002). What does the Research Say about Teaching and Learning? University of Virginia, Curry School of Education.

High Plains Regional Technology Educational Consortium (HPR*TEC). Profiler Survey System.

Hyjek, P. The Criteria of the Vermont Classroom Observation Tool. State of Vermont, Department of Education.

Idaho State Department of Education. Idaho Exams and Assessments Evaluations. http://www.sde.state.id.us/Dept/

International Society for Technology in Education (ISTE) (2002). National Educational Technology Standards for Teachers: Preparing Teachers to Use Technology. Eugene: ISTE. http://cnets.iste.org/

i-Safe (1999). I-SAFE America's Internet Safety Training.

Johnson, D. (2002). Code 77 Rubrics.

Market Data Retrieval (MDR). Technology in Education 2002. http://www.schooldata.com/whatsnew.html

Maryland State Department of Education. Maryland Technology Performance Task Summaries. Metiri Group & North Central Regional Educational Laboratory (NCREL) (2002). enGauge 21st Century Skills. NCREL.

National Association of State Boards of Education (NASBE) (2001). Any Time, Any Place, Any Path, Any Pace: Taking the Lead on e-Learning Policy.

National Business Education Alliance. Level of Technology Implementation (LoTi) http://www.learning-quest.com/LoTi/

National Center for Education Statistics (NCES)(2000). Teachers' Tools for the 21st Century: A Report on Teachers' Use of Technology.


National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), National Forum on Education Statistics, & US Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement (2002). Technology in Schools: Suggestions, Tools, and Guidelines for Assessing Technology in Elementary and Secondary Education. Washington DC: US Department of Education.

NEIR*TEC (Northeast & the Islands Regional Technology In Education Consortium) (2002). Technology Briefs for No Child Left Behind Planner.

Nelson, C. A., Post, J., & Bickel, B. (2001). Institutionalization of Technology in Schools Checklist.

North Central Regional Education Laboratory (NCREL) (2000). enGauge. www.ncrel.org/engauge/

Northeast and the Islands Regional Technology Consortium (NEIR*TEC) (2002). Technology Briefs for No Child Left Behind. Education Development Center.

President's Information Technology Advisory Committee, Panel on Transforming Learning (2001). Using Information Technology to Transform the Way We Learn.

Serim, F. The Importance of Contemporary Literacy in the Digital Age: A Response to Digital Transformation: A Framework for ICT Literacy.

Slavin, R. E. (2002). Evidence-Based Education Policies: Transforming Educational Practice and Research. Distinguished Lecture Dewitt Wallace-Reader's Digest.

State of Vermont, Department of Education. Culture, Content, Implementation Scoring Sheet, Vermont Assessment system.

Texas Education Agency Educational Technology. Texas Technology Literacy Standards for Students and Educators. www.tea.state.tx.us/technology/ta

The American Society for Training and Development (ASTD), & National Governors Association (NGA) (2001). E-Learning Workforce for America's, A Vision of Report of the Commission on Technology and Adult Learning.

The TLT Group. Flashlight Program for the Study and Improvement of Educational Uses of Technology.

The Web-Based Education Commission (2000). The Power of the Internet for Learning, Moving From Promise to Practice.

Towne, L., Shavelson, R. J., & Feuer, M. J. Science, Evidence, and Inference in Education. Committee on Scientific Principles in Education Research Center for Education, Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education National Research Council, National Academy Press.

United States General Accounting Office (1998). Telecommunications and Information Technology, Federal Programs That Can Be Used to Fund Technology for Schools and Libraries.

Utah Depart of Education. Utah Technology Awareness Project.

White, N., Ringstaff, C., & Kelley, L. (2002). Getting the Most out of Technology in Schools. WestEd.

Wisconsin Department of Education. Wisconsin Technology Survey Results. http://www.dpi.state.wi.us/dpi/dltcl/imt/techsurvey.html

Writing with Computers. Technology and Assessment Study Collaborative, Boston College.

Wyoming Department of Education (2002-2003). District Technology Survey.

Scientifically Based Research | Technology Literacy Assessment | Common Data Elements | Effective Teaching with Technology Assessment | National Education Technology Plan

© 2003 SETDA.

Scientifically Based Research
Technology Literacy Assessment
Common Data Elements
Effective Teaching with Technology Assessment
National Education Technology Plan